skip to main content

The real Event 201 (Covid-19)

A “high-level pandemic exercise”, called Event 201, was organised on October 18, 2019. It simulated a coronavirus pandemic and was organised by the Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum and John Hopkins University.1 Just some months later the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a world-wide pandemic due to an emergence of a so-called novel coronavirus. This has resulted in tremendous increase of fear of “aggressive external pathogens”, authoritarian lockdowns of many societies and high-speed development of new generation vaccines by the Big Pharma companies. Has this been a natural chain of unfortunate events or are there facts and data, which have been hidden from the sight of many?

Marcus Schultze

Published on May 27, 2021

For a perspective thinker it is a worthy challenge and even a task (together with his co-thinkers) to find out what really was initiated in our world in 2020, with starting of a new cycle according to a Chinese lunar chart as 2020 was the year of a Rat. The beginning of new cycles is indicated also in Occidental systems, either by the conjuction of Jupiter-Pluto (a new cycle of 13 years), Jupiter-Saturn (20 years) and Saturn-Pluto (35 years).

Approximately 3 billion people worldwide were quarantined into lockdowns, which has affected major continents and was implemented shortly after communist China was the first to introduce such draconian measures in January 2020. Just few countries have avoided a drastic lockdown of the whole society, e.g. Sweden, Japan, South-Korea (which has instead enforced heavy electronic surveillance of those infected or probably infected etc), also a number of US states.


Several institutions have made “predictions” on such global pandemic and especially on the reactions of medical establishments and governments. For instance, The Rockefeller Foundation published a report in May 2010 on future scenarios, where the first scenario “Lock Step” describes a world of total government control and authoritarian leadership. It envisions a world where a pandemic would allow national leaders to flex their authority and impose airtight rules and restrictions that would remain after the pandemic faded.2 In 2015 Bill Gates, founder of the vaccine-promoting Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the main private donor of the World Health Organisation (WHO), talked about a future pandemic saying that if anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades it is most likely going to be a highly infectious virus – “the microbes” – rather than a war.3 The World Economic Forum has for sometime envisioned a future with more technocratic surveillance over societies4 and in 2020 they started the “Great Reset” initiative hailing the opportunities Covid-19 has created for societies and the world economy.5 One of the leaders of the Forum, Klaus Schwab, has in July 2020 published a book carrying the same title.

Such envisioning with elements of predictive programming have characterized several major events of the modern era. Therefore, it certainly is not surprising that the whole chain of related Covid-19 events resemble a psychological operation (psyop) of a global scale, which seems to test the limits of mankind for digesting official narratives, systematic fear-mongering media propaganda, limitations on freedom of speech and academic discussion and authoritarian restrictions on the everyday functioning of our societies. German analytic Paul Schreyer has shown in his research that pandemic scenarios have been repeatedly rehearsed in several simulation exercises during the last 20 years – first in the United States, later coordinated internationally. “Dark Winter” (2001), “Global Mercury” (2003), “Atlantic Storm” (2005), “Clade X” (2018) and “Event 201” (2020) have been attended by high-ranking government representatives, well-known journalists and members of the medical and pharmaceutical communities.6 Thus, the real-life Covid-19 event together with its measures instructed by the WHO and taken by authorities world-wide has been well practiced and at the same time appears to be a preparation for something, which comes after – The New Normal.7


In order to understand the “microbes” Bill Gates has been loudly talking about, we need to see if such ones have in fact been identified as the cause of Covid-19 disease. Notably, several researchers and doctors have pointed out that there is scarce evidence about the bugs. Dr Stefano Scoglio together with researchers Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter have disclosed that the studies claiming to have found a novel coronavirus, have in fact not purified and identified the virus itself.8 Similarily, chemist Saeed A. Qureshi has explained that virologists and microbiologists have not executed the correct and scientific procedure of extraction, purification, identification, and structure determination of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but by the term “virus isolation” have meant just “separating virus from the host”.9 Dr Andrew Kaufman has highlighted that Covid-19 virus has never been isolated, purified and visualized and there has not been made a concrete association with the illness. Science has not proved the existence of Covid-19 virus.10 Dr Michael Yeadon has noted that even one year after declaring of the pandemics it seems that no one’s got any correctly identified virus and that there has not been a fully described purification of the virus by medical science.11

Indeed, the causes of disease is a vast subject and will be treated in a separate analysis. But it is evident that medical science knows still little of the causes of disease in the beginning of the 21st century. It has an incredibly narrow view on human health, being unaware for instance of such crucial causative factors as wrong rhythm of life (ignorance of the law of periodicity) and the emotional origin of most diseases, which depend on hatred in its countless modes of expression.12

In the following, the origin, character and treatment of Covid-19 disease shall be elaborated on as there are several basic issues and related questions, which might help us to keep attention on the causes and comprehend the bigger picture.


Let’s ask the following questions: Does this novel type of coronavirus originate from “wild nature”, as conventional medicine speculates from the beginning of January 2020 or were there other causes for such a disease to emerge? If other causes are more plausible, what can be the reasons for it?

Is this “virus” or pathogenic substance one of the aggressive reactions of nature to man’s violations towards it, as been suggested by some scientists13? This might be one possible hypothesis, if one takes the claim of the pathogen originating from the “wild life” for granted. Those scientists have noted that there are at least 1,7 million viruses in nature and speculate that each one of them can be the next virus X, which will transfer from wild-animals to humans and will cause even more harm, if humans do not make considerable change in their actions towards nature and environment. Indeed our planet as a living entity has suffered from deliberate harm by human beings, especially after the industrial revolution. According to the laws of life, any harm will be thrown back with the same measure to the originator as an individual, part of a group or a larger collective.

Dr Luc Montagnier

But if we further ask how such a pathogen allegedly emerged from “wild-life” in the first place and are there other clues for a possible man-made cause, then we can get another perspective. Some analysts have pointed to clandestine defence programmes specially designed for the creation of bio-weapons14 – using the family of coronaviruses for it and especially bats as carriers15. Several doctors have shared their concerns on the origin of such a virus16 or have concluded of its man-made origin17 and a study has shown its pecularity18. French Nobel Prize winner Dr Luc Montagnier has claimed that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated man-made “virus” and was accidentally released from a lab.19 The President of the US stated that he has seen evidence indicating the man-made origin of the virus, which originates from a Wuhan lab,20 and in January 2021 the US Department of State was ordered to issue a fact sheet about the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origin of the pandemic.21

Why should we ask about the cause of the possible “pathogen-virus”? Because this might give us some clues on answering the next questions. Also:

  • if it is a synthesized man-made pathogen, then we might expect it to be somewhat more enduring than other infections and possibly designed to cause more harm;

  • if it is a synthesized man-made pathogen, then it is justified to ask about the motives and goals of such an action (either been released on purpose or “accidentally”).

Though man-made origin might mean that the pathogen is designed to cause more harm, there are restrictions to harm and suffering even in the lowest physical world. The law of cause and effect is such a restriction and does not allow unjustified harm to subjects, if some action is even intended to cause as much harm as possible.

The motives and goals of such possible deliberate action are indeed worrisome, but not surprising for a perspective thinker, who has comprehended the state of affairs in the physical and emotional worlds of our planet. One might discover in those motives similar characteristics as in the recent past22. A pandemic of such a scale can be used as a reason for some unnatural and subhuman global concerted action, which will be executed on national levels and will be presented to the masses as an inevitable consequence.

Epidemics and pandemics

Notably, the annual outbreak of epidemics in the last 40 years has doubled.23 In the short 20 years of the 21st century, there has been over 60 epidemics compared to the less than 100 epidemics in the entire 19th and 20th centuries combined.

Arthur Firstenberg

Researcher Arthur Firstenberg has drawn correlations between influenza pandemics starting from the end of 19th century and the changes in Earth’s electromagnetic fields caused by exponential installation of different electrical devices all over the world – introduction of the so-called modern electrical era in 1889. In each case of major pandemics – in 1889-1894, 1918-1919, 1957-1958 and 1968-1969 – the electrical envelope of the Earth, to which all are attached by invisible strings, was suddenly and profoundly disturbed:

  • in 1889 by expansion of electrification by availing of large amounts of power from diverse locations
  • in 1918 by a rapid and large-scale installation of radio stations and radio networks
  • the year 1957 marked the installation of radar worldwide and
  • in 1968 the US launched the world’s first constellation of twenty-eight military satellites right into the heart of the outer Van Allen radiation belt, in the middle of the most vulnerable layer of the earth’s magnetosphere.24

In the middle of 2019, the world witnessed a beginning of a new satellite era as SpaceX started to launch Starlink satellites regularly to the low Earth orbit (LEO) for ensuring wireless internet service – by May 2021 SpaceX had launched already 1385 Starlink satellites.25 In total at least 12000 satellites are planned only by SpaceX to be deployed in coming years,26 thousands of satellites will be added to the LEO by other companies, e.g. OneWeb, Boeing, Spire Global etc.27

Firstenberg has pointed out that influenza, in its present form, was “invented” in 1889, along with alternating current. It is with us always, like a familiar guest – so familiar that we have forgotten that it wasn’t always so. Many of the doctors who were flooded with the disease in 1889 had never seen a case before.28 Also, some recent research has pointed out the similarity between the 1889 outbreak and Covid-19 outbreak of 2020.29

Other factors have also been associated with contributing to the appearance of influenza pandemics, most notably activity of the Sun. Researchers have discussed it in several studies, e.g. John Yeung (2006), Fred Hoyle (1990), J. H. Douglas Webster (1940), Aleksandr Chizhevskiy (1936), C. Conyers Morrell (1936) and others. Canadian astronomer Ken Tapping, together with two British Columbia physicians, have discussed in 2001 that for at least the last three centuries influenza pandemics have been most likely to occur during peaks of solar magnetic activity – that is, at the height of each eleven-year Sun cycle. Danish physician Johannes Mygge showed in his monograph that influenza pandemics tended to occur during years of maximum solar activity and that the yearly number of cases of flu in Denmark rose and fell with the number of sunspots.30


Does SARS-CoV-2 virus differ from other viruses in a way that is asserted – e.g. is it more dangerous and deadly than other influenza-like viruses, which emerge every winter in our societies?

The main facts emerging gradually do suggest that the character of Covid-19 can be compared to other influenze-like illnesses in the past. Covid-19 has not presented substantial differences from stronger seasonal flu31 or at least to pandemic flu (as in 1957 and 1968), though it is presented in much darker tones by the WHO and mainstream media and considered to be caused by a “new type of coronavirus”. Viruses are said to mutate every year, as it is considered to be their nature to mutate.

Prof Hendrik Streeck

Also, this coronavirus does not appear to be more enduring than other viruses of the same family. Though tests carried out in lab premises have indicated that Covid-19 can be “alive” from 3 hours (paper and copper) to up to 4 days (paper money, glass and plastic) and remain outside of surgical masks up to 7 days32, live tests carried out in Germany state the opposite. Prof Hendrik Streeck with his team from University of Bonn tested surfaces in real life in one of the epicenters of Covid-19 – Gangelt, Germany – and concluded that there was little chance that someone could become infected via surfaces (a la doorknob or shopping cart etc), as the virus was already in a non-active or dead state33. Moreover, Christian Drosten from Berlin’s Charite has stated that coronavirus is extremely sensitive to drying out, so the only way of contracting it is if you were to “inhale the droplets.”34 Finally in April 2021, US Center for Disease Control and Prevention stated that the risk is low for people to be infected through contact with contaminated surfaces or objects.35

Covid-19 pandemic is based on PCR-tests

It has to be kept in mind that the official version of the Covid-19 pandemic is strongly based on the data received from PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing. “Test, test, test” has been the main mantra repeated by the WHO as an instruction to national governments from the beginning of the pandemic36 and PCR-tests have been the tool for carrying out such instruction through mass-testing.


But PCR-tests are deemed unreliable and very problematic as diagnosing tools in clinical medicine by many experts. Criticism on PCR-testing has been amplified by scientists and doctors – especially by 22 renown scientists, who have conducted an external peer review on the so-called Corman-Drosten review report, which laid the basis for global wide-scale Covid-19 PCR-testing in January 2020. Their peer review have revealed 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level and the authors have asked to retract the Corman-Drosten publication from the editorial board of Eurosurveillance.37 Dr Thomas Cowan points out that the PCR-test, which is a surrogate test, does not prove a pathogenic virus, but examines the pieces of genetic material taken from a person’s sinus cavity. No research has shown that this genetic material is unique to that of coronavirus or even that it comes from a coronavirus.38 Dr David Rasnick has stated that a PCR-test is a horrible tool for clinical medicine.39 Dr Michael Mina stated already in summer 2020 that those tests are too sensitive and unreliable as primary diagnosing tools40 and finally in December 2020, just before the rollout of the Covid-19 experimental vaccines, the WHO admitted that PCR-tests can create false positives due to high cycle thresholds of the tests.41 Researcher David Crowe has pointed out that this test is not binary, meaning that the point between positive and negative is drawn arbitrarily.42 Dr Michael Yeadon (former Chief Scientific Advisor in Pfizer) has stressed that many false positive tests have been identified and the PCR-tests are unreliable43. By the way, the inventor of the PCR technique, Dr Kary B. Mullis (Nobel prize for the invention) has explained that PCR testing is not exact and does not confirm the sickness.44 And in 2014, Dr Christian Drosten himself warned (in relation to MERS) that PCR is so sensitive that it can detect a single genetic molecule of this virus, meaning now suddenly mild cases and people who are actually very healthy are included in the reporting statistics.45

Deaths in Sweden during years

During the whole pandemic, official figures have been received from mass PCR-testing, which has seen an increase of at least 10-fold and more world-wide in the second half of 2020 and the first half of 2021, compared to spring 2020. Unusually in disease management, a positive test result is the sole criterion for a Covid-19 case. Normally, a test is a support for clinical diagnosis, not a substitute.46 Thus in statistics, Covid-19 positive cases are positive PCR-tests. Hospital admissions are people in hospital who test positive (e.g. in UK all patients are tested)47 and so it is in several other countries. Deaths are in many countries just people who die of any cause, but have been tested positive, so-called deaths with Covid-19. English doctor Clare Craig has made a thorough analysis of the UK data, which reveals a strikingly different picture of the Covid-19 pandemic compared to the official headlines.48 Therefore, the world-wide event has been also called a PCR-pandemic, as it cannot hold up as a pandemic without the massively performed PCR-tests.49 As Dr Sucharit Bhakti and Dr Karina Reiss have noted, the more tests are performed, the more Covid-19 cases are found during the epidemic – this is the essence of a laboratory-created pandemic.50

This “novel” disease can be described by the following main characteristics:

Lethality: according to data from many countries, the overall lethality of Covid-19 is between 0,1% and 0,5%, similar to strong seasonal influenza.51 Average age of those died with or likely died from Covid-19 is ca 80 years and 98-99% of them had at least one or several previous serious illnesses. Lethality drops gradually as time goes by and as compared to so-called official statistics (the ratio between those positive PCR-tests and those died with/from Covid-19), when it is tried by anti-body testing.52

Covid-19 deaths UK vs Sweden
  • Symptoms: over 90% of those tested positive have no symptoms or have mild to moderate symptoms53. According to a vast study in Iceland at least 50% of those tested positive with PCR-tests are “asymptomatic” and other half have mostly mild or moderate symptoms54.

  • Prevalence: anti-body testing in the US has established that Covid-19 has infected 50-80 times more people than official statistics claims55, which means that it is more wide-spread and much less harmful than suggested by those who have made fearful and grotesquely wrong predictions.56 Anti-body testing has been conducted in the US (e.g. Dr John Ioannidis’s study in Santa Clara county), Belgium, Germany (in virus epicenter Gangelt) etc. Also, the WHO stated in October 2020 that roughly 1 in 10 people worldwide (ca 760 million people) may have been infected by Covid-19 – more than 20 times the number of confirmed positive tests.57

But there are also differences from seasonal influenza, especially regarding children – a large study in Iceland concluded that children under 10 years of age are very little infected of Covid-1958 and not transmitting the virus to adults59, while they are infected by and can be carriers of influenza viruses.

Notably, it has been concluded that Covid-19 mortality profile is almost identical to natural mortality. The mortality profile is essentially zero for children and young adults and near zero below 50, before it begins to rise slowly and then steeply above 70 and especially above 80, reaching extreme levels in nursing homes.60

The claim on asymptomatic carriers

Declaring healthy persons a public threat as asymptomatic transmitters of the illness has been one of the cornerstones of the official Covid-19 narrative. Such asymptomatic spread assumptions drive all of the other non-clinical authoritarian interventions, e.g. social distancing, mass-testing of healthy people, mandatory masks and lockdowns of societies. But in fact, the term “asymptomatic transmission” is contested by several medical experts as there is very weak evidence for this phenomenon being anything other than mistaken interpretation of false positive test results.61

Dr John Lee

Dr John Lee from the UK think-tank Health Advisory & Recovery Team (HART) has discussed that positive PCR is not evidence of infectiousness, and that transmission of a virus requires active infection resulting in high levels of viral replication and shedding. Symptoms, such as coughing, are the real drivers of spread. He has concluded that robust evidence of asymptomatic spread is lacking and runs counter to all previous understanding of how respiratory viruses transmit.62 Prof Allyson Pollock and researcher James Lancaster have highlighted that symptomatic and presymptomatic transmission have a greater role in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 than asymptomatic transmission and that the transmission rates to contacts within a specific group (secondary attack rate) may be 3-25 times lower for people who are asymptomatic than for those with symptoms, based on different studies.63 Dr Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford University) has explained that asymptomatic individuals are an order of magnitude less likely to infect others than symptomatic individuals, even in intimate settings such as people living in the same household where people are much less likely to follow social distancing and masking practices that they follow outside the household. A meta-analysis of 54 studies from around the world found that within households – where none of the safeguards that restaurants are required to apply are typically applied – symptomatic patients passed on the disease to household members in 18 per cent of instances, while asymptomatic patients passed on the disease to household members in 0.7 per cent of instances.64

Regarding statistics, it is important to note that countries strongly differ in gathering statistics on people who died with or likely died from Covid-19.65 For instance Italy, US, Sweden, Finland etc have recorded all deaths as Covid-deaths if a person’s PCR-test turned out positive, regardless of the cause of death. In the UK, anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive PCR-test is registred as a Covid-19 death, regardless of the real cause of death.66 In the US there is an instruction given by the National Center for Health Statistics to record a death as a Covid-death even if it is just assumed to be related with the virus: "Covid-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death."67 Moreover, Washington State Department of Health has admitted that the death toll includes anyone who tested positive for the virus, even if they died from other causes, e.g. a gunshot.68


Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell

The most common symptoms of Covid-19 are similar to flu: fever, dry cough and fatigue. Certain less common, but strange phenomena have characterized some patients. For instance, data now emerging points out that in many cases the disease has not caused typical pneumonia.69 Instead, patients show symptoms of progressive hypoxia (oxygen deprivation)70, which is the condition of low oxygen levels in the blood and tissues. Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell, an emergency physician affiliated with Maimonides Medical Center (Brooklyn), has suggested that oxygen deprivation symptoms resemble closely high-altitude sickness and the use of ventilators in those cases can cause more harm than good,71 which has been noted also by other doctors.72 Also, microscopic blood clots have been found not only in lungs, but almost in every other organ of some Covid19 victims according to autopsy reports in the US.73

Other less common symptoms include loss of taste and smell, breathlessness, aches and diarrhea. It has been noted that many of those fore-mentioned symptoms resemble the symptoms of electromagnetic poisoning, which affect more electrically sensitive and vulnerable people. Electromagnetic smog affect most people, but electrically sensitive people react much stronger to changes in electromagnetic atmosphere. Their vulnerability is strongly increased by the recent introduction of new electromagnetic environments with the gradual world-wide roll-out of 5G technology in 2020. 5G uses microwave frequencies – mostly 24-72 GHz for high-band frequencies and ca 0,6-4 GHz for low and mid-band frequencies. Several organisations74, scientists and doctors75 – e.g. Dr Devra Davies76, Dr Martin Pall77, Dr Lennart Hardell78, Dr Joel M. Moskowitz79 etc – have seriously warned about the roll-out of 5G technology, which uses much smaller and densely located geographical cells for the transmission of microwaves than older generation technology and will be affecting all organic lifeforms 24/7 by not its power, but its specific frequencies and the pulsed, erratic nature of the signals. An editorial, which was published in June 2020 and after that quickly retracted by the editor of the journal, linked 5G millimeter waves to playing a role in producing coronaviruses in biological cells.80 Interestingly, the military has already decades ago created crowd-control devices that operate in the similar microwave ranges as 5G: 6-100 GHz. For instance the Active Denial System (95 GHz) is a weapon that can penetrate the skin and produce intolerable heating sensations, causing people to move away from the beam.81

One reason for the significant differences in Covid-19 susceptibility around the world may be the underlying toxicity burden of the population in each region. For example, studies have found a striking correlation between exposure to particulate air pollution and the likelihood of dying from such diseases. Early epicenters of Covid-19 correspond with areas of high air pollution – Wuhan in China, New York and New Jersey in the US, northern Italy, Spain.82 Notably, atmospheric dust – which is pollution – can exacerbate the negative effects of electromagnetic smog and toxicity.


What could be the treatments that have been associated with the illness and pandemic? What effect do they have on our lives?

There is no official cure for such disease, but instead we have seen demands by medical officials and authorities to lock people inside, avoid any contacts and even avoid exercising outside. Though the cure can be found in doing the opposite – to breathe fresh air and be in nature, exercise, socialize, eat nutrient-rich food, which all help to maintain our health and increase immunity, especially during sunlight deficient months in the Northern hemisphere.


Conventional medicine is helpless against such disease symptoms appearing in people and have resorted to recommending restricting people’s interaction, shutting down economies, schools, gyms etc and requiring compulsory mask-bearing from the society. But there is little rationality83 and science84 in lockdowns and they have shown to be counterproductive85. Lockdowns are mostly a theatrical, but authoritarian reaction from authorities to show that they are “fighting” against the disease86. Much more harm has been done by lockdowns than by the disease87 and full lockdowns88 with wide-spread Covid-19 testing have not been associated with reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality.89 Countries with harsh lockdown policies have not been able to decrease the disease more effectively than countries, which have not enforced harsh lockdowns to the society.90 Real-life has provided significant evidence – at least ten US states did not enforce a winter lockdown in 2020/2021 and fared altogether better than lockdown states (see graph: Total Covid Deaths in US States). For instance, Florida governor Ron DeSantis opened the state in September 2020 and refused to enforce a lockdown during the entire autumn-winter season – Florida’s Covid19 results were at least similar to e.g. California, which enforced a harsh lockdown from early on.91


Sweden did not enforce a lockdown and has less recorded deaths with Covid-19 than many other lockdown-contries in Europe (e.g. Spain, France, UK, Portugal, Poland, Italy, Belgium, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Romania etc.).92 Also, new deaths attributed to Covid19 started to decrease in Sweden similarily to United Kingdom in January 2021, which had enforced a severe lockdown already in the end of 2020 (see graph: New Deaths attributed to Covid19 in UK and Sweden).

Tens of thousands medical professionals from around the world have warned against draconian and disproportional lockdown measures – e.g. The Great Barrington Declaration, initiated by Dr Martin Kulldorff (Harvard Medical School), Dr Sunetra Gupta (University of Oxford) and Dr Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research), recommends an approach called Focused Protection and offers reasonable alternatives instead of devastative lockdowns.93

Dr Martin Kulldorff, Dr Sunetra Gupta and Dr Jay Bhattacharya

A growing number of doctors in e.g. Belgium94, Germany95 and internationally96 have written open letters to governments to end authoritarian lockdown policies and choose wiser strategies for societies. Dr Kulldorff, Dr Gupta, Dr Bhattacharya and Dr Carl Henegan (University of Oxford) have initiated world-wide research into the collateral effects of responses to the Covid-19 pandemic.97


Conventional medicine is offering little to prevent or treat so-called infectious diseases. The “magic bullet” promoted by the Big Pharma companies and conventional medical communities dependant on them are the vaccines. Such a belief is disputed by more-and-more doctors and scientists.

Dr Suzanne Humphries

Dr Suzanne Humphries, the author of “Dissolving Illusions”, has discussed that vaccines have never been safe, there will never be a safe vaccine and it is not possible to have a safe vaccine. The reasoning behind it is that the actual process of vaccination defies the natural function of the immune system of living beings. Vaccines do not increase the health of a human and there is nothing in the vaccines that our bodies actually require.98 Dr Bruce Lipton has explained how vaccines dangerously fool and bypass organism’s strong defence systems and distort our natural response to any toxic external substances. Natural defence acts through tonsils, which have a crucial role in immunological detection and learning.99 Dr Guylaine Lanctot has stated that contamination from vaccines short-circuits all the body’s first line of defences and includes innumberable short-term, medium-term and long-term complications.100 Dr Larry Palevsky has particularly warned against toxic adjuvants in the vaccines and pointed out the harmful effects of e.g. aluminium nanoparticles in them.101

For most of the many recent epidemics like SARS, MERS, Ebola, Marburg, Zika, and Dengue, there is no vaccine. In the history of conventional medicine, no vaccine has been developed in a timely manner for an ongoing epidemic. Though conventional medicine asserts that the proper development and trials of vaccines take many years – at least about 18-24 months – the Covid-19 experimental vaccines have been enforced to fast-tracking. Pharmaceutical companies are referring to a new generation genetic material-based vaccines, either a DNA vaccine or messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. Both DNA and mRNA vaccines involve the introduction of foreign and engineered genetic material into a person’s cells. Past studies102 have found that such vaccines “possess significant unpredictability and a number of inherent harmful potential hazards” and that “there is inadequate knowledge to define either the probability of unintended events or the consequences of genetic modifications.” The recent findings of several scientists103 changed the way science comprehends DNA-RNA interrelation and highlighted the possibility of coronavirus genetic sequences to enter the human genome104, which leads to strengthened concerns about the safety of the RNA vaccines105.

Dr Michael Yeadon

Many doctors from around the world have warned against such vaccines and urged people to make their own thorough research before making up their mind.106 German microbiologist Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, co-author of the book Corona Fehlalarm? (Corona False Alarm?, 2020) has stated that the Covid-19 vaccines are downright dangerous and totally unnecessary.107 American internal medicine physician Dr Carrie Madej has warned about the fast-tracking vaccine development and the dangers accompanying such “new generation” experimental vaccines.108 Dr Simone Gold from American Frontline Doctors have highlighted the experimental nature and serious risks accompanying mRNA vaccines.109 German Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and former Pfizer Chief Scientic Officer Dr Michael Yeadon have filed an application to the European Medicine Agency for the immediate suspension of all Covid-19 vaccine studies and pointed out several vaccine dangers, e.g. the formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” that can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, also that the vaccines can include a risk to create infertility in vaccinated women and the vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG), for which ca 70% of people can can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions.110

Dr Peter McCullogh

Dr Peter McCullogh (Texas A&M University) has warned that the Covid-19 shot has already caused thousands of deaths, tens of thousands of hospitalizations that have been recorded and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.111

It is revealing that the main private donor of the WHO, billionaire Bill Gates, has strongly advocated for world-wide vaccination campaigns and has repeatedly said life cannot go back to normal until we have enough vaccines to inoculate the global population.112 He has interests in Big Pharma companies113 and ties to vaccine-producers BioNTech114, Curevac115 and Moderna.116

Vaccine-belief derives from a radical physicalist view of the world, promoted vigorously by the pharmaceutical industry and shared by many in the conventional scientific community, which states that:

  • there are many harmful pathogens out in the world
  • those pathogens attack human beings and animals without apparent (or without known) reason and
  • human beings should via vaccine injections “teach” their organism’s immune system how to protect itself and eliminate such harmful pathogens. Without such “teaching” or “mobilisation of body’s forces”, our organism is not able to protect itself.


The forces advocating for a vaccine as a “treatment” against viruses have long been pressuring for compulsory vaccination in the world and have gradually also succeeded in some countries, especially introducing mandatory vaccination for newborns, school pupils etc. Such vaccinations have led to growing concerns. E.g. a vaccine used during a recent swine flu “pandemics” in 2009 caused narcolepsy117 to at least 1300 young people in Europe and this is just one out of many serious consequences of vaccine injections. The effect of vaccinations on injuring our physical bodies has been the subject of many disputes, claims and studies by a increasing number of medical professionals, scientists and also insiders from the pharmaceutical business118.

This continuous and systematically pursued desire for mandatory vaccinations raises an evident question on the effect of vaccinations (the substances it contains, also in nano-size) not only on our organism’s, but also to higher envelopes and through that to our efforts for consciousness development. Especially the effect of vaccine substances on our etheric envelope and on our ability to connect with higher energies and strive for higher consciousnesses. For instance, can such injections have a hindering effect to the etheric envelope for it to convey higher energies to our physical brain?

The Etheric Envelope

As already noted, modern medical science does not have a proper clue on the causes of most diseases. For instance, it has not examined seriously the knowledge publicly available on the importance of the etheric envelope and its relation to the organism.119 But it should be the business of medical science to discover man’s etheric envelope, the etheric energies, and the connecting link between the etheric envelope and the organism. As medical science appears irremediable in its dogmatic adherence to erroneous old views, it will take some time before these discoveries are made.120

Similarly, science has not yet comprehended that our physical bodies have not been created out of nothing or “by chance”, but is the result of the work carried out by beings from higher kingdoms and on higher stages of development than human beings during many millions of years. Our organisms, as we experience them today, have achieved its state of near perfection through this long and gradual process of refinement. It is equipped with a highly complex and powerful immune system, which derives its origin, force and vital energy from our second physical envelope – the etheric envelope.


The etheric envelope is the essential physical envelope as it contains all the energy centres that control the organism. The organism is an automaton or a robot – without its etheric envelope, the organism could not have been formed and it would be without life. The etheric envelope makes physical perception and consciousness possible. Without his physical etheric envelope the individual would lack sense perceptions. The etheric envelope consists of a network made up of countless threads or channels (nadis) of etheric matter. These threads consist of etheric molecules held together electromagnetically. Diseases arise in the etheric envelope before they appear in the organism.121

It is important to note that also our planet has an etheric envelope. What damage we human beings do to the planetary etheric envelope by our nuclear weapon tests, our “peaceful” utilization of nuclear power, and our pollution of earth, water, and air with petrochemical substances and heavy metals will be gradually found out by future science when it has discovered the existence of etheric envelopes. According to the law of reaping, mankind must take the consequence of such madness.122 The rise of collective diseases is connected with this as one of the consequences.

The radical physicalist approach discards an essential insight that microbes are not harmful to human beings if our organism and its higher bodies have been taken proper care of – meaning that:

  • we have been relatively free of poisons

  • we consume vital and natural nourishment for food

  • we are harbouring positive emotions and impressions

  • we have had enough rest, regular sleep and physical exercise

  • we have been able to reduce the damage of stress to our bodies etc

If those principles are violated, then it will result in imbalance – first in the etheric envelope, which manifests later in the organism --, a weaker immune system and eventually disease, which aims at purifying the exhausted and weakened organism, detoxify it, letting it rest and restore its functionality. As Dr Stefan Lanka has pointed out: “In the reality of the body and of its mechanisms, there is no place for hypothetical malignant processes. All biological processes, including those that can end in suffering, pain and death, are originally meant to be useful.”123

The role of vitamins and minerals

Unfortunately it is not surprising that information and knowledge of real natural treatments have been suppressed and labelled as “not evidence-based” by the physicalist scientific community, which is under strong influence from corporate and financial interests124.

Dr Linus Pauling

For instance, the knowledge on vitamin C (ascorbic acid), which was first synthesized in its pure form in 1935 and has been tested by many scientists and doctors (Frederick R. Klenner, Robert Cathcart, Irwin Stone, Linus Pauling, Paul Marik etc) in hundreds of experiments and studies during almost a century. It has shown remarkable properties and is in high enough and sufficient doses (50-200 mg per one kilo of body weight per dose) efficient against the majority of the so-called pathogens and toxins125. There are many doctors, who are promoting the use of vitamin C against several diseases, including Covid19.126 The “magic” of vitamin C presents itself in a fact that it is the essential nutrient in most powerful fruits and vegetables. So even as human beings are not able to synthesize that water-soluble vitamin in their organisms by themselves (contrary to animals, e.g. dogs synthesize up to 5000 mg daily127), nature is presenting this cure against any toxic substances to us when we live naturally and use the gifts of nature. If somebody eats natural and pure plant-based food, his vitamin C (and other essential nutrients) stores will be high and his organism’s strong immune system maintained.

Natural protocols based primarily on vitamins and minerals have been used efficiently to cure patients from the Covid19 symptoms. For instance, American doctors David Brownstein and Richard Ng have successfully treated hundreds of patients with a combination of high doses of vitamins A, C and D, also Iodine and nebulized Hydrogen Peroxide.128

Mean vitamin D levels per country versus COVID-19 deaths/1M population

More research evidence has emerged on the vital importance of essential nutrients, especially Zinc, Vitamin D and Vitamin C. Dr Ryan Cole has said that normal vitamin D levels decrease Covid19 symptoms severity risk and hospitalization by 90 percent. It is a scientific fact as there have been a lot of placebo-controlled trials that show this all around the world. He also maintains that there is no such thing as cold and flu season, but only low vitamin D season.129 Studies have found clear relationships between vitamin D levels and Covid-19 cases, especially mortality caused by this disease. The most vulnerable group of population – the aging population (e.g. see graph: severely low vitamin D levels in Spain, Italy and Switzerland) – is also the one that has the biggest deficit of Vitamin D130 and low Vitamin C levels.131 Early calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) treatment to hospitalized Covid-19 patients significantly reduced intensive care unit admissions.132 Acquisition of liquid vitamin D formulations is associated with decreased risk for Covid-19 infection.133 Zinc, selenium and vitamin D have been strongly recommended for raising anti-viral resistance against progressive Covid-19.134 Vitamin C (high-dose intravenous) improves oxygenation and shows a potential signal of benefit for critically ill patients with Covid-19.135 Research has shown that a significant number of Covid-19 patients are zinc deficient, those patients developed more complications and the deficiency was associated with a prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality.136 Serum zinc levels lower than 50 µg/dl at hospital admission correlated with worse clinical presentation, longer time to reach stability and higher mortality.137 Therefore, prophylactic and early treatment of people at high risk are crucial for significantly reducing the risk of severe or fatal suffering of the disease.138


What are the next scenarios and aftermaths of such world-wide pandemic and its measures – the lockdowns?

In 2020, most of the world had succumbed to an emotional microbe-hysteria on an enormous scale. Rational analysis and critical questions have been avoided and conventional medicine has sold its pandemic-narrative to the masses. Canadian critic David Crowe concluded in his thorough research of Covid-19139 that there is very little science happening, but instead we witness a rush to explain everything that is happening in a way that does not question the viral paradigm, does not question the meaningfulness of test results, and that promotes the use of untested antiviral drugs and vaccines.


It is evident that one of the biggest impacts to many societies has been the dramatic increase of fear – fear of contagion, fear of “harmful” pathogens, which manifest in a fear of contacting and being close to other people, fear of touching surfaces, even fear of “wild nature” and “wild animals” and of course, fear of death.

Germaphobia now infecting much of the world like a mental virus is an irrational fear based on ignorance. Anxiety and stress lower resistance and make people more susceptible to illness, including the “infection” they fear.140

In fact, our coarse physical envelopes (organisms) are filled with trillions of microbes – in every human organism there are trillions of bacteria and many times more trillions of viruses. Virome interactions with the host cannot be encompassed by a monotheistic view of viruses as pathogens. Instead, the genetic and transcriptional identity of mammals is defined in part by our co-evolved virome, a concept with profound implications for understanding health and disease.141 It has been a natural state of our physical organisms during millions of years and those pathogens should be working for us, not against us, if we follow the laws of life and respect nature and our environment.

Even if we mostly fail to follow the laws of life, the etheric envelope is still there to help and serve us. We are not meant to suffer more than necessary according to the laws of life, as through diseases we are also taught lessons to take care of our bodies in a proper manner and treat those gifts for that specific incarnation with respect and heed.

Fear has a consequence that in many people (especially in the vast majority being on emotional stage) it further severely damages the immune system and immune responses, depletes of vital nutrients and increases anxiety, discontent and frustration. This is an accepted view even among conventional doctors and still they follow the pattern of promoting fearful behaviour and a vague hope in a “magic bullet” (a vaccine) instead of stressing the need for strengthening one’s immune system, taking care of stress and fear and preferring natural cures over synthetic ones. According to Dr Cowan, research has shown that toxic exposure, including exposure to fear and stress, increases exosome (“viruses”) production. This should come as no surprise to any honest observer of sickness and health since many have noted that stressed, worried, fearful people get sick easier, so it makes sense that you would find increased detoxification “products” in their tissues. Moreover, fear weakens people and makes them emotionally more susceptible to mass influences, insinuations and propaganda, which are mainly based on emotional impulses and basic urges as carriers of subjecting messages. As American Frontline Doctors, leaded by Dr Simone Gold, revealed in July 2020, societies are not held down by the virus as much as by the spiderweb of fear, which is all around us and is constricting us and draining the life blood of the people and society.142

Already decades ago, William Sargant, a psychiatrist with the British Tavistock Institute, exposed the threat of mind control through fear:

Various types of belief can be implanted in people after brain function has been deliberately disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances the most common one is temporarily impaired judgment and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of ‘herd instinct,’ and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility … We would be advised not to underestimate the effect on the collective psyche in terms of fear and a desire for the authorities to ‘protect people’ from that fear.143

Of course, fear lays basis for and facilitates adoption of measures in societies, which aim at diminishing our freedoms (freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom from harassment by the government etc) and hamper the work for consciousness development. It remains to be seen what will be the aftermath to the present pandemic, e.g.:

  • more global electronic surveillance
  • less freedom of speech and academic opinion in the internet
  • more mandatory and direct medical interference into people’s lives and introduction of “digital certificates” connected with that
  • more powers to the governments to introduce extraordinary measures in the case of “public threat”
  • more urge for “global unified and standardized responses in protecting societies and people” etc

Less freedom of speech in internet and extended search restrictions through algorithm manipulations by search engine providers mean that it will be harder for people to find the information needed for their consciousness development and mental efforts. Mandatory medical interference by allopathic medicine and pharmaceutical corporations will carry harming risks and side-effects to our physical bodies and also to its higher etheric counterpart. “Global unified responses” are steps into the direction of centralizing power and transferring decision-making from local and national levels over to supranational levels.


What can we do about such events and how can we fill our part in serving mankind and evolution?

Many people (scientists, doctors, medical workers etc) with common sense and using their critical thinking are sharing their views and assessments about the unprecedented situation, helping people to comprehend more and also check the validity of official information about the pandemic and the applied measures. This is beneficial work to counteract consensus trance, which is easily induced by fear and unexpected new conditions introduced in many societies. Furthermore, such measures have shaken people out of their ordinary comfort zones, which can be regarded beneficial to certain intellectual people who might end up in discovering more about the world they are living in and about themselves.

We can help by gathering relevant information, filter it with our common sense and share our conclusions and concern with those, who are ready to reflect on it. This will counteract fear, which is based primarily on ignorance. We can also be ready for the aftermath and possible scenarios and serve as carriers of hope, positive attitude and natural solutions. Also because we possess hints about the future we can work for – better possibilities for mankind’s consciousness development.

  1. Event 201 on October 18, 2019 ↩︎

  2. Rockefeller Foundation report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development ↩︎

  3. Bill Gates in 2015 ↩︎

  4. Graham Dockery Humans of the Great Reset (December 2020) ↩︎

  5. World Economic Forum Great Reset ↩︎

  6. Paul Schreyer Pandemic Simulation Games (March 2021) ↩︎

  7. Documentary The New Normal (January 2021); also ↩︎

  8. Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter on Covid-19 virus and tests (June 2020):; Dr Stefano Scoglio, T.Engelbrecht and K.Demeter Phantom Virus: In search of Sars-CoV-2 (Jan 31, 2021): ↩︎

  9. Dr Saeed A. Qureshi and ↩︎

  10. Del Bigtree interview with Dr Andrew Kaufman in Highwire (July 2020) ↩︎

  11. Dr Michael Yeadon interview Ex-Pfizer science chief on the Covid lies: Part 3 in The Conservative Woman(April 2021) ↩︎

  12. Henry T. Laurency Knowledge of Life 3 – Health, 13.1 ↩︎

  13. Prof Josef Settele, prof Sandra Díaz, prof Eduardo Brondizio and Dr Peter Daszak (April 27, 2020): ↩︎

  14. Whitney Webb analysis (Jan 30, 2020) ↩︎

  15. Declan Butler Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research (November 2015) ↩︎

  16. E.g. French doctor Jean Bernard Fourtillan on the origin of Covid-19 ↩︎

  17. Dr Steven Quay analysis and conclusions (January 29, 2021) ↩︎

  18. A study The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade (April 2020) ↩︎

  19. Luc Montagnier on Covid-19 ↩︎

  20. E.g. in CNBC on April 30, 2020 ↩︎

  21. US Department of State Fact Sheet: Activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (January 2021) ↩︎

  22. E.g. SARS outbreak in 2002-2003 and a global pandemic declared in 2009 for swine flu, which did not result then in harsh lockdown measures yet, but in further tightening of requirements for compulsory vaccine injections in societies and large-scale development of vaccines and vaccine purchases from Big Pharma companies ↩︎

  23. BBC The History of Pandemics ↩︎

  24. Arthur Firstenberg The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (2020), chapter 8 ↩︎

  25. SpaceX launches 25th mission for Starlink internet network (May 2021) ↩︎

  26. Space X plans for the future ↩︎

  27. Other satellites to be added to the LEO ↩︎

  28. Arthur Firstenberg The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (2020), prologue ↩︎

  29. Mark Buchanan Our Coronavirus Predicament Isn’t All That New (May 15, 2020) ↩︎

  30. Arthur Firstenberg The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (2020), chapter 7 ↩︎

  31. Dr Sucharit Bhakti interview (January 2021) ↩︎

  32. Tests in lab premises ↩︎

  33. Prof Hendrik Streeck tests in real life ↩︎

  34. Ibid ↩︎

  35. CDC in April 2021: ↩︎

  36. WHO instruction: ↩︎

  37. Corman-Drosten review report: ↩︎

  38. Dr Thomas Cowan The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including ‘Coronavirus’) Are Not The Cause of Disease (July 2020), ch 6 ↩︎

  39. Dr David Rasnick: ↩︎

  40. Dr Michael Mina in an NY Times article Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be (Aug 29, 2020): ↩︎

  41. WHO admits the problem with PCR-tests: ↩︎

  42. David Crowe: ↩︎

  43. Dr Michael Yeadon, Paul Kirkham and Barry Thomas How Likely is a Second wave? (September 2020): ↩︎

  44. Kary B. Mullis on PCR-tests ↩︎

  45. Dr Christian Drosten interview in 2014: ↩︎

  46. Prof A.Pollock and J.Lancaster in British Medical Journal (December 2021): ↩︎

  47. The data from UK: ↩︎

  48. Dr Clare Craig data analysis: ↩︎

  49. Dr Michael Yeadon: ↩︎

  50. Dr Karina Reiss, Dr Sucharit Bhakti Corona Fehlalarm? (2020) ↩︎

  51. Swiss doctors data on Covid-19:; Swiss doctors on mortality:; Also, Dr John Ioannides: ↩︎

  52. Studies on Covid-19 lethality ↩︎

  53. Swiss doctors on hospitalizations ↩︎

  54. Icelandic study ↩︎

  55. Anti-body testing in the US ↩︎

  56. Computer modelling by Neil Fergusson team from the Imperial College, UK ↩︎

  57. WHO assessment in October 2020 ↩︎

  58. Icelandic study on children ↩︎

  59. Study on children ↩︎

  60. Swiss doctors on Covid19 mortality profile: ↩︎

  61. Dr Clare Craig and Jonathan Engler Has the Evidence of Asymptomatic Spread of Covid19 been Significantly Overstated?: ↩︎

  62. Dr John Lee *Asymptomatic spread: who can really spread Covid-19? *(March 27, 2021): ↩︎

  63. Prof A.Pollock and J.Lancaster in British Medical Journal (December 2021): ↩︎

  64. Interview with Dr Jay Bhattacharya *Risk of Asymptomatic Spread Minimal. Variants Over-Hyped. Masks Pointless.(March 25, 2021) ↩︎

  65. Kit Knightly When it comes to vaccines, suddenly “from vs with” matters again (March 15, 2021): ↩︎

  66. Deaths recorded in the UK: ↩︎

  67. Deaths recorded in the US ↩︎

  68. Washington State Department of Health: ↩︎

  69. E. Lupon et al, Combating hypoxemia in COVID-19 patients with a natural oxygen carrier, HEMO~2~Life® (M101) (January 2021): ↩︎

  70. V.Somers, T. Kara and J. Xie Progressive Hypoxia A Pivotal Pathophysiologic Mechanism of COVID-19 Pneumonia (November 2020): ↩︎

  71. Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell video testimony on such symptoms:; ↩︎

  72. Dr Kyle-Sidell with other doctors: ↩︎

  73. Autopsy findings on microscopic blood clots: ↩︎

  74. 5G appeal: ↩︎

  75. Doctors and scientists on 5G: ↩︎

  76. Dr Devra Davies on 5G dangers to human health and to other lifeforms:; ↩︎

  77. Dr Martin Pall 5G: Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field; (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them (May 2018): ↩︎

  78. Dr Lennart Hardell and Rainer Nyberg: ↩︎

  79. Dr Joel M. Moskowitz: ↩︎

  80. M.Fioranelli et al, 5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells, Journal of Biological Regulators & Homeostatic Agents (June 2020): ↩︎

  81. Dr Thomas Cowan The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including ‘Coronavirus’) Are Not The Cause of Disease (July 2020), ch 2 ↩︎

  82. Dr Stephanie Seneff Air Pollution, Biodiesel, Glyphosate and Covid-19 (July 2020): ↩︎

  83. Analyst Philippe Lemoine Lockdowns, Science and Voodoo Magic (December, 2020) ↩︎

  84. Studies on the effect of lockdowns:; Also, analyst George Michael Covid19: Beating Fear with Science (January 2021): ↩︎

  85. Ethan Yang Focused Protection Would Have Been the Right Pandemic Response (May 2021): ↩︎

  86. Jeffrey A. Tucker Catastrophe Is All Around Us (January, 2021)/ ↩︎

  87. Dr Sebastian Rushworth:; Analyst George Michael: ↩︎

  88. E. Bendavid, C. Oh, J. Bhattacharya, J. Ioannidis Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19 (January, 2021)*: * ↩︎

  89. Christian Bjornskov Did Lockdown Work? An Economist’s Cross-Country Comparison (March 2021):; ↩︎

  90. Swiss doctors On the Illusion of Control (January 2021):; Also, Dr Sebastian Rushworth On Sweden’s Covid19 Response and Effects: ↩︎

  91. Comparison between Florida and California ↩︎

  92. Country comparison of deaths per 1 million inhabitants: ↩︎

  93. The Great Barrington Declaration: ↩︎

  94. Open letter from medical doctors and health professionals to all Belgian authorities and media (Sept 2020): ↩︎

  95. Open letter from Dr Bhakti to A.Merkel (March 2020):; Also: ↩︎

  96. World Doctors Alliance: ↩︎

  97. Collateral effects of responses to the Covid19 pandemic: ↩︎

  98. Dr Suzanne Humphries: ↩︎

  99. Dr Bruce Lipton: ↩︎

  100. Dr Guylaine Lanctot The Medical Mafia: How to Get Out of It Alive and Take Back Our Health and Wealth (1995), p 118-119 ↩︎

  101. Dr Larry Palevsky testimony during a public hearing at the Connecticut legislature (February 2020): ↩︎

  102. Vivian S.W. Chan Use of genetically modified viruses and genetically engineered virus-vector vaccines: environmental effects (November 2006) ↩︎

  103. L. Zhang et al, Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues (May 2021): ↩︎

  104. Neville Hodgkinson Can the Covid vaccine change our DNA? (May 18, 2021): ↩︎

  105. Dr Doug Corrigan on how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA: ↩︎

  106. Doctors around the world have issued a warning on vaccines: ↩︎

  107. Dr Sucharti Bhakti interview ↩︎

  108. Dr Carrie Madej ↩︎

  109. Dr Simone Gold ↩︎

  110. Dr Wodarg and Dr Yeadon application to the EMA ↩︎

  111. Dr Peter McCullogh interview (April 2021) ↩︎

  112. Dr Joseph Mercola on Bill Gates influence ↩︎

  113. Gates Foundation Buys Stakes in Drug Makers in Wall Street Journal (May 2002) ↩︎

  114. F. William Engdahl What’s Not Being Said About Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine (November 2020) ↩︎

  115. Bill and Melinda Gates-backed coronavirus vaccine maker soars in Wall Street debut in CNN (August 2020) ↩︎

  116. Jeremy R. Hammond on B.Gates ties to Moderna ↩︎

  117. M. Partinen et al, Increased incidence and clinical picture of childhood narcolepsy following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccination campaign in Finland (March 2012): National Library of Medicine ↩︎

  118. E.g. a recent book available by a former insider Dr Judy A. Mikovits Plague of Corruption (published in April 2020) ↩︎

  119. Henry T. Laurency The Way of Man – The Physical Being of the First Self, 4.3-4.6: ↩︎

  120. Henry T. Laurency The Way of Man – The Physical Being of the First Self, 4.19.16 ↩︎

  121. Lars Adelskogh The Etheric Envelope, 4.2., 4.5.10, 4.7 ↩︎

  122. Lars Adelskogh The Etheric Envelope, 4.23.7 ↩︎

  123. Dr Stefan Lanka Dismantling The Virus Theory (June 2015) in the journal Wissenschafftplus ↩︎

  124. E.g. on WHO’s interest of conflict during the last swine flu pandemic ↩︎

  125. Thomas E. Levy Curing the Incurable – Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases and Toxins (2011), contains over 1200 scientific references; Many references are also listed here: Orthomolecular ↩︎

  126. E.g. the UK initiative Vitamin C for Covid ↩︎

  127. Dr W. Gifford-Jones Medical Ignorance and the Mass Murder of Coronavirus Patients (October 2020): ↩︎

  128. Del Bigtree interview with Dr Brownstein and Dr Ng on their Covid19 treatment protocol ↩︎

  129. Dr Ryan Cole lecture (March 2021) ↩︎

  130. A study The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality (May 2020); A study Vitamin D and survival in COVID-19 patients: A quasi-experimental study (November 2020): Sciencedirect website ↩︎

  131. A study Serum Levels of Vitamin C and Vitamin D in a Cohort of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients of a North American Community Hospital Intensive Care Unit in May 2020: A Pilot Study (December 2020): Science redirect ↩︎

  132. A study Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study (October 2020): Science redirect ↩︎

  133. A study The link between vitamin D deficiency and Covid-19 in a large population (September 2020) ↩︎

  134. A study Early Nutritional Interventions with Zinc, Selenium and Vitamin D for Raising Anti-Viral Resistance Against Progressive Covid19 (August 2020): National Library of Medicine ↩︎

  135. A study Pilot Trial of High-dose vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19 patients (September 2020) ↩︎

  136. A study COVID-19: Poor outcomes in patients with zinc deficiency (November 2020) ↩︎

  137. A study Low zinc levels at clinical admission associates with poor outcomes in COVID-19 (October 2020): Medrxiv ibid ↩︎

  138. Swiss doctors on Covid19 treatment protocols: ↩︎

  139. David Crowe Coronavirus Panic (June 2020) ↩︎

  140. David Pratt Virus Mania and Covid19, chapter 8 ↩︎

  141. Herbert W. Virgin *The virome in mammalian physiology and disease *(2015) ↩︎

  142. Dr Simone Gold and American Frontline Doctors ↩︎

  143. William Sargant The Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing (1997) ↩︎